Evaluarea psihologică a personalului, între paradigmele selecţiei şi adaptării
Keywords:
I/O field, Psychological evaluation of personnel, selection paradigm, adaptation paradigmDownloads
References
Arthur Jr., W., Bell, Suzanne T., Villado, A. J., & Doverspike, D. (2006). The Use of Person–Organization Fit in Employment Decision Making: An Assessment of Its Criterion-Related Validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 786–801.
Asociația de Psihologie Industrială și Organizațională. (2013). Starea actuală a psihologului specializat în psihologia muncii și industrială. București: APIO.
Billsberry, J. (2007). Experiencing Recruitment and Selection. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Billsberry, J., & Searle, R. H. (2007). Fit as a Recruitment and Selection Paradigm. Paper presented at the 1st Global e-Conference on fit.
Bowen, D. E., Ledford, G. E., & Nathan, B. R. (1991). Hiring for the organization, not the job. Academy of Management Executive, 5(4), 35–51.
Cable, D. M., & Edwards, J. R. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 822–834.
Dawis, R. V. (2004). The Minnesota theory of work adjustment. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career Development and Counseling: Putting Theory and Research to Work (pp. 3–23): Wiley.
Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1964). A theory of work adjustment. Minnesota Studies in vocational rehabilitation: XV (http://www.psych.umn.edu/psylabs/vpr/pdf_files/Monograph%20XV%20-%20A%20Theory%20of%20Work%20Adjustment.pdf).
Dawis, R. V., Lofquist, L. H., & Weiss, D. J. (1968). A theory of work adjustment (A Revision). Minnesota studies in vocational rehabilitation: XXIII, Bulletin 47 (http://www.psych.umn.edu/psylabs/vpr/pdf_files/Monograph%20XXIII%20-%20A%20Theory%20of%20Work%20Adjustment%20(a%20revision).pdf).
Fallaw, S. S., & Kantrowitz, T. M. (2013). 2013 Global Assessment Trends Report. Alpharetta, Georgia, U.S.A.: SHL.
Herriot, P. (1992). Selection: the two sub-cultures. European work and organizational psychologist. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2(2), 129–140.
Herriot, P. (1993). A paradigm bursting at the seams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14 (4), 371–375.
Iliescu, D. (2013). De ce psihologii români specializați în psihologia muncii și organizațională nu au opțiuni. O critică adresată sistemului nostru de formare. Psihologia resurselor umane, 11(2), 8–10.
Kantrowitz, T. M. (2014). 2014 Global assessment trends report. Thames Ditton, Surrey, UK: CEB.
Karren, R. J., & Graves, L. M. (1994). Assessing person-organization fit in personnel selection: Guidelines for future research. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2(3), 146–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.1994.tb00135.x
Levesque, L. L. (2005). Opportunistic hiring and employee fit. Human Resource Management, 44(3), 301–317. doi: 10.1002/hrm.20072
Muchinsky, P. M., & Monahan, C. J. (1987). What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3), 268–277.
Popa, M. (2008). Introducere in psihologia muncii. Iași: Editura Polirom.
Popa, M. (2012a). Psihologie militară. Iași: Editura Polirom.
Popa, M. (2012b). Studiu cu privire la competențele autoasumate de studenții la psihologie. București: Universitatea din București (Raport proiect POSDRU 58717).
Popa, M. (2012c). Studiu privind competențele așteptate de către angajatori din partea absolvenților de psihologie Universitatea din București (Raport proiect POSDRU 58717).
Salgado, J. F., Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2005). Predictors used for personnel selection: An overview of constructs, methods and techniques. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 1, Personnel Psychology, pp. 165-199). London: SAGE Publications.
Talbot, D. L., & Billsberry, J. (2010). Comparing and contrasting person-environment fit and misfit. Paper presented at the 4th Global e-Conference on Fit Coventry University and The Open University in the UK.
Thissen, D., & Wainer, H. (2001). Preface. In D. Thissen & H. Wainer (Eds.), Test scoring. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Thompson, M. M. (2008). Individual Difference Theory and Research: Application to Multinational Coalition Teamwor (RTO-MP-HFM-142): NATO Research & Technology Organization.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal,it also allows for use of the work for non-commercial purposes and if others remix, transform or build upon the works found in this journal they must distribute the contributions under the same licence as the original.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See: The Effect of Open Access).


